October 15, 2004
Leadership Tools: The "Holon" Model
by Dr. Mike Armour
The last third of the twentieth century gave us a number of new
models to help leaders analyze their organizations. One that I find
particularly intriguing is the concept of "holons, from the Greek word "holos,"
meaning "whole, entire, or complete."
Your company is a holon. So is your family. Or your church or
synagogue. In fact, you yourself are a holon. That's because any entity in the
universe can be thought of as a holon
Defining a Holon
Arthur Koestler, who introduced the term in 1967, described a holon
as 1) a whole made up of constituent parts, yet 2) a whole which is itself part
of another, more complex whole. Thus, an atom is a holon which is part of a
more complex holon called a molecule which is part of a holon that is even more
complex, e.g., a compound or a cell.
Any organization you lead is also a holon. It is 1) made up of
constituent parts and 2) part of a more complex whole. As a consequence, your
organization is governed by the same principles that govern holons.
Within any holon four forces work against each other constantly.
These forces go by different names, dependent on which theorist you read. But
whatever you choose to call them, your role as a leader is to manage the
organizational tension they generate.
To visualize the four forces, think of them as operating along two
axes, one vertical, the other horizontal. Operating on the vertical axis are
factors that impact your organization's further development. Along the
horizontal axis are factors that influence your organization's relationship to
its environment. For that reason I refer to these axes as "developmental" and "relational."
The Four Forces in a Holon
On each axis, two opposing forces are at work. The upward thrust
along the developmental axis is a force called "transcendence." It's the press
for your organization to become more than it currently is. To develop further.
To transcend itself. To become a new, more comprehensive holon. (One word of
caution. This more comprehensive holon is not necessarily larger. Rather it's
more sophisticated. More capable. More "developed.")
Working against transcendence is a counterforce called "disintegration." Disintegration draws its energy from the factors conspiring
to destroy your organization. To pull it apart. To break it down into its
constituent parts, its "sub-holons."
Likewise, two opposing forces run along the relational axis. My
typical names for these are "autonomy" (which I picture as pulling to the left)
and "affiliation" (pulling to the right). In every organization there are
pressures to "go it alone," which promotes autonomy. Tugging against this
tendency is another group of factors that make for interdependence with other
organizations. (Think of other organizations as other holons.) This attraction
promotes affiliation.
The Holon You Lead
Whatever your level of leadership, your unit of oversight is a
holon. Unless you are a CEO or part of a top management team, your holon is not
the entire organization. Your holon may go by names such as division,
department, branch, or even workgroup. But the four holon forces are tugging at
your organization, whatever its size and complexity.
As the leader, you are responsible for managing this tug-of-war. In
effect, strategy is a broad statement of how you will respond to the interplay
of these four forces. What will your organization do to transcend itself? How
will it deal with the threats of disintegration? And to what degree will your
organization go it alone or team with others?
In the maelstrom of trying to monitor everything that demands
leadership attention, the holon model is a helpful device for sorting things
out. Everything you are responsible for, every challenge you must contend with,
contributes to one of the four holon forces.
So ask yourself: what factors in my organization make for
transcendence? Which ones encourage disintegration? What draws my organization
toward going it alone? What pushes it instead toward interdependence?
Mapping the Forces
As you think about these issues, create a chart on a sheet of paper.
Place the word "transcendence" at the very top, "disintegration" at the bottom, "autonomy" to the left, and "affiliation" to the right. Then, go back through
the questions in the previous paragraph. As you answer each question, write
your response on the sheet of paper. Cluster responses related to transcendence
toward the top, responses related to autonomy toward the left, etc.
The resulting map becomes a useful tool in assessing the health of
your organization. Are the forces of disintegration building? Are you locked in
a frustrating status quo because of inadequate momentum for transcendence? Do
you have a healthy balance of autonomy and affiliation? As you work through
these issues, I'm confident you'll gain some valuable new insights. And you
will find that thinking in terms of holons is an elucidating way to view
organizational life.
© 2004, MCA
Professional Services Group, LLC
|